Atiba de Souza.Start a conversation
WritingMarketing

Your Testimonials Are Impressing the Wrong People

By Atiba de Souza

An editorial cover image for a piece on Your Testimonials Are Impressing the Wrong People. The cover reads: MARKETING Your Testimonials Are Impressing the Wrong People

The testimonial you are proudest of is not doing a thing

You have them. The glowing review. The client who says you changed their business. The video with the clean lighting and the logo in the corner. They sit on your homepage, in your proposal, on your LinkedIn.

And the buyer you actually want scrolls past every one.

Not because the testimonials are weak. Because they are aimed at everybody, and a message aimed at everybody moves nobody. That is the thing you have been staring at and could not see: you have been collecting proof, and proof without a target is decoration.

Three days to page one of Google. The proof that opened my entire medical market was one phone video recorded mid-sentence, not a single polished testimonial on a homepage.

I am going to fix this with three of the practices I teach in The 7 Practices of Effective Marketing, then show you two real moments where the difference was worth more than any ad budget.

A real customer and an ideal customer are not the same person

You have customers you love. Some you have served for fifteen years. So when you sit down to build your ideal customer profile, you widen it until it covers everyone who has ever walked in. Every industry. Every size. Every problem.

Stop. A real customer and an ideal customer are two different things. You can serve someone loyally for fifteen years and still never aim your message at them.

Ideal Customer: the person you would still be glad to serve if they were the only kind who ever walked in.

That is the test. Not "can I serve them?" Almost certainly yes. The test is "would I be happy if only that kind ever walked in?" If the answer is no, that glowing testimonial from them is not aimed at your future. It is a memory.

Practice one: The Win

The Win is the first of the seven practices. Every game has a way to score, and everyone playing knows what scoring looks like. Marketing is no different. Before any work begins, the win has to be defined in terms you can measure.

For a testimonial, the win sounds like this: the right buyer books a call. Not "more testimonials." Not "social proof." A measurable outcome.

Here is what that costs you, and I want you to feel it before you nod along. Right now you can post testimonials, feel busy, and never once be told you missed. The moment you name a measurable win, every nice-looking testimonial that does not move it gets called what it is: decoration. That is a colder scoreboard than most people want, because for the first time it can tell you that you lost. Pick it anyway. A scoreboard you can lose on is the only kind that tells you anything.

Practice two: Thinking Steps Not Tactics

The second practice is Thinking Steps Not Tactics. The instinct in marketing is to jump straight to tactics, and a testimonial is a tactic. So the reflex is "we need testimonials." That is backwards. Before any tactic gets considered, you map the logical steps required to reach the Win, in order. Tactics are how you execute a step. They are not a substitute for the step itself.

So map it out. Before you record anything, write the sequence down. For most businesses it looks something like this:

  1. A stranger learns you exist.
  2. The stranger recognizes their exact problem in your words.
  3. The stranger hits the one doubt that stops them, the "will this work for someone like me" doubt.
  4. The stranger sees proof that kills that doubt.
  5. The stranger books the call.

There it is. Step four is where a testimonial lives. And notice what the map hands you that a pile of testimonials never will: the specific doubt the testimonial has to kill. Not doubt in general. The one doubt standing between your buyer and step five.

Now the cost. Mapping the steps first feels like stalling, because you are not producing anything you can post yet. Tactic-first feels fast and productive. That is the reflex you have to rewire. You are trading the dopamine of "we did a thing" for a testimonial that has a job, for one person, at one step, killing one doubt. If there is no mapped step and no specific doubt, the testimonial is decoration.

Practice three: Narrow the Focus

The third practice is Narrow the Focus. At any moment there is usually more than one important thing to communicate, and the pull is to say all of them at once. So you write the testimonial to cover every customer you have ever had. Which reaches none of them.

Narrow means the testimonial is written to move one kind of person: your ideal customer. When they read it, it should feel like it was made about them, by someone like them, for the exact doubt they are carrying.

Here is the decision, inside the practice, not saved for later. Take your best testimonial and run the test: would I be happy if only that kind ever walked in?

  • Yes: that testimonial leads.
  • No: that testimonial stops leading. It does not get deleted. It stops being the message.

That is a filter, and it is a yes or a no, not a feeling.

And here is what narrowing costs you, because this is the hard one. It can cost you the testimonial from the big-name client who is not your ideal customer. It can cost you the comfort of the fifteen-year customer you love. When you look at a glowing review and say "that is not for my future customer," you are cutting against loyalty, and it feels like dropping a weapon right before a fight. I am not going to pretend it does not. But a message written to cover every customer you have reaches none of them. The wide net is the thing costing you, not the thing protecting you.

The testimonial that impressed nobody and opened everything

In 2021, on a business mastermind call, someone I could not even see asked how to get their YouTube videos onto page one of Google. The moderator knew I knew the answer and handed me the floor. I rattled it off and never learned who had asked.

Months later, that group met in person for the first time since COVID. I was standing in the lunch line when an unnamed man in a lunch line walked up and said, "Hey, you! You gave me some advice on a call recently. You told me how to rank my videos on page 1 of Google, and it ranked in 3 days!"

In the middle of that, I said, "Hold on, hold on, hold on. Do you mind if I record you?" I pulled out my phone, stuck it up, and let him keep talking. He was just talking, giving this testimonial at the peak of his excitement.

Now watch what one shaky phone video actually did, because this is the turn.

It did not impress a crowd. There was no crowd. It moved one man, and that man invited me to teach a group of doctors, which is where I met the doctors I met through him — Dr. P and Donnie. Donnie invited me to speak at IOF. That is the reason the entire medical world now knows who I am.

If I had waited for him to finish, or asked him to write a nice review later, there would be no recording, no doctor group, no Dr. P, no Donnie, no IOF stage. The testimonial was not proof sitting in a folder. It was a key. It turned only because I captured it at the exact moment the excitement was real, mid-sentence, in a lunch line.

And note what this is not. Capturing at the peak is not a fourth practice. It is what the three practices produce when you run them on a live moment: the Win was the relationship, step four was the doctor group, and the narrow focus was the one man in front of me.

The practice owner who did not need an agency

A Philadelphia practice owner came to me wanting to advertise. He was ready to hire an agency and start feeding an ad budget.

I told him not to. Here is the do-differently: before buying an agency campaign, record about five patient testimonials and run those as the ads. That is it. He went out and recorded about five patient testimonial ads. One or two of them hit, and brought in tons of patients.

Do not turn that into a formula. My read of that win is that it is not repeatable by anyone else, or even by him. It was one or two testimonials landing with the right people at the right moment, not volume, not a repeatable playbook.

And here is what he avoided. Had he hired the agency, he would have carried an ad spend he had to keep feeding, and he would have ended up where established practices that have advertised for years still are: behind, playing catch-up. Instead he recorded proof aimed at the exact patient he wanted, and the proof did the work an agency budget was supposed to do.

The inconsistent move versus the consistent move

The inconsistent move (impresses everyone)The consistent move (moves the Win)
Collect every testimonial you can getCollect the ones that answer your ideal customer's doubt
Ask for a review after the project wrapsRecord at the peak of their excitement
Write it for your widest possible audienceWrite it for one person you would be happy to serve alone
Keep the impressive logo, even off-profileKeep the on-profile voice, even if it is quiet
Measure how good it looksMeasure whether the Win moved

The framework at a glance

No

Yes

1. The Win
the measurable outcome

2. Thinking Steps Not Tactics
the ordered path to it

3. Narrow the Focus
your ideal customer, not every customer

Apply to one testimonial:
kill the specific doubt, for one ideal customer

Would I be happy if only that kind ever walked in?

That testimonial leads

What matters most, and what does not

If you take one thing, take this: narrow before you collect. Everything else is downstream of who the testimonial is for.

Production quality, video versus text, length: minor. Ignore all of it until the aim is right. A shaky phone video aimed at the right person beats a cinematic testimonial aimed at no one. I know, because that is exactly how the door to my whole medical market opened.

And one place to stop. If you cannot yet name your ideal customer, do not start recording testimonials. You will only manufacture more beautiful noise. Define

Questions

What people ask next

Okay but what if I genuinely serve several very different types of ideal customers well, not just one? Does the 'only kind that ever walked through the door' test force me to pick just one and ignore the rest?
Run the test separately for each type, not once across all of them. If you would be glad to serve only that kind, it passes, and that gives you more than one narrow focus, not a blended one. The mistake isn't having several ideal customers, it's writing one testimonial or one message that tries to speak to all of them at once.
If a testimonial fails the ideal-customer test, you say it just stops leading instead of getting deleted, but what do I actually do with it then? Just let it sit somewhere unused?
Yes, it sits unused as the lead message, because the problem was never the testimonial itself, it was the job you gave it. It can still exist in a folder or further down a page, it just no longer occupies step four for your ideal buyer's exact doubt. Deleting it would be throwing away proof; demoting it is just putting it back in its place.
Both stories in here hinge on catching someone mid-moment of raw excitement. Most of my testimonials come from asking after the fact, politely, over email. Does any of this still work when I can't catch lightning like that?
The capture method isn't the practice, the three practices are. What made the lunch-line video and the five patient ads work is that each one hit a specific doubt for a specific person, not that it was recorded on the spot. An email testimonial can still do that job if you ask for it with the mapped step and the one doubt in mind, you just lose the rawness that makes proof feel undeniable.
How do I actually figure out the one specific doubt a buyer is carrying before I record anything? That feels like the hardest step and the article doesn't really show how you land on it, only that you need it.
It sits in the map, between the stranger recognizing their problem and them booking the call: it's the 'will this work for someone like me' hesitation. You find it by looking at what real buyers actually say or ask right before they stall or walk away, not by guessing in the abstract. Without mapping the steps to the Win first, you're just collecting praise with no doubt attached to kill.
When I cut the loyal, big-name, or long-term customer's testimonial from the lead position because they're not 'ideal,' how do I keep that from being read as disloyalty, either by them or by my team?
Be honest that it will feel like dropping a weapon right before a fight, because it is cutting against loyalty, not against the person. The move isn't a judgment on them or the relationship, it's a decision about who the message is aimed at now. Name that out loud to your team: the wide net built from loyalty is what's costing you reach, not the thing protecting the relationship.