Atiba de Souza.Start a conversation
WritingMarketing

Why Your Discount Isn't Fixing Your Sales Problem

By Atiba de Souza

An editorial cover image for a piece on Why Your Discount Isn't Fixing Your Sales Problem. The cover reads: MARKETING Why Your Discount Isn't Fixing Your Sales Problem

The offense that turned out to be a lesson

Around 2007, thirteen years into running a bakery and gift-delivery business known for elaborate multi-tier cakes, I got invited to a young cousin's birthday party at a bouncy-house venue. Nobody had called me. I drove over assuming they'd grabbed a supermarket sheet cake, already composing the mild resentment in my head.

The cake was a three-tier Lightning McQueen. Gorgeous. Clearly not from a supermarket.

I was offended. Family, and they didn't call me. I pulled an aunt aside to find out who'd done it, ready to hear a name I'd have to be gracious about.

She told me they paid a friend of a cousin $65.

My price for that cake, even with the family discount I'd have given, was over $300.

Here's the test I now run on every claim that "the problem is the price": imagine the fix is fully applied. Say I'd shown up at that party and, stung, offered the family a steep discount right there. Say I cut $300 down to match their number. Would it have worked?

No. Not close. $65 was never a discount away from $300. It wasn't a negotiation, it was a different market. I could have given the cake away at cost and still overshot what that family was ever going to spend on a birthday cake. The discount does nothing when the buyer was never priced to reach you in the first place.

That's the whole lesson, and it's cleaner than the moral I used to tell myself about loyalty. I wasn't dealing with family going elsewhere out of disloyalty. I was dealing with a number that no discount, however generous, was ever going to move.

Where this shows up in your sales problem

Run that same test on your own business right now. Sales are soft. Someone in the room says "let's run a discount." It feels like action. It feels fast.

Imagine it fully applied. Run the discount. Everyone on the fence buys. What actually changes?

If your honest answer is "we still don't have enough of the right people even looking," your discount was never going to fix anything. You took margin off a problem that was never about margin, the same way I'd have taken margin off a cake that was never going to sell to that family at any price that made sense for my business.

Seventy percent of what you publish should ask for nothing. If most of your content is already asking, you don't have a sales problem. You have a math problem you built yourself, one piece at a time.

The framework: WHY, HOW, WHAT

This is the Why/How/What content engine. It maps every piece of content, and every commercial move, to where a stranger actually sits on the way to buying: Know, Like, Trust.

  • WHY (Know, 70% of output): one pain point, tied to one of three things people actually want — relationships, status, or money. Low-commitment ask. You're getting a stranger to raise a hand and say "that's me," nothing more.
  • HOW (Like, 15%): you show the way you do the thing. This is where a stranger starts believing you specifically, not just the category.
  • WHAT (Trust, 15%): the offer. The specific ask. The price. The close.

Constraint: the one stage of Know → Like → Trust that is actually broken, as opposed to the stage you're most comfortable poking at because you already have a lever for it.

A discount is a WHAT move. It only does anything if enough Know and Like already exist and price is the last friction left standing. If the constraint sits upstream, at Know or Like, the discount doesn't touch it. It just makes your WHAT louder while your WHY and HOW stay silent.

How to tell which stage is actually broken

You cannot skip this step and go straight to the audit. The audit only tells you something if you know what you're looking for first.

  • Know-broken looks like: low reach, low volume, strangers not finding you at all. Your content exists but almost nobody outside your existing circle ever sees it. There's no one raising a hand because there's no hand-raising happening in front of enough people.
  • Like-broken looks like: people see you, some even follow you, but nothing sticks. No replies, no return visits, no one coming back for a second piece. They know you exist. They don't yet believe you're the one who does this specifically, and well.
  • Trust-broken looks like: people know you, engage with you, ask you questions, then go quiet exactly at the ask. This is the only place on the whole map where a discount does real work, because everything upstream already happened.

Most businesses assume they're Trust-broken because that's the stage closest to the sale, the one that hurts the most when it fails, and the one with the easiest lever sitting right next to it. Cut the price, fix the pain. Except the pain is usually further back.

WHY content, 70%

HOW content, 15%

WHAT content, 15%

Strangers

Know

Like

Trust

Buys

A discount lives at D. If your break is at B or C, you're pulling a lever attached to nothing.

Rank this, because not every part of it matters equally

The one thing that matters here: diagnose the stage before you touch the tactic. Everything else, including the 70/15/15 split, is secondary. Get the ratio slightly wrong and you'll survive. Misdiagnose a Know problem as a pricing problem and you won't, not cheaply.

The minor thing, useful but not the lesson: the specific content mix. Knowing most of your output should be WHY is a good operating rule. It's not the insight that saves the quarter.

And the part most people skip: when NOT to discount, full stop. If the people asking for a lower price are the $65 crowd, structurally incapable of ever reaching your price, a discount doesn't win them. It teaches you, expensively, that they were never in your addressable market. The aunt didn't need a discount from me. She needed a $65 cake, which I don't make, and no promotion I could have run that day would have changed that.

The part nobody wants to hear

Cutting a price feels like doing something. Auditing your funnel feels like admitting you did the wrong thing for months, maybe years. One is a five-minute decision. The other means going back through your last twenty pieces of content, tagging each one WHY, HOW, or WHAT, and finding out you've been all WHAT the whole time, all offer, no relationship built, and wondering why strangers won't buy from a stranger.

Do the audit and there's a real chance the honest tally is ugly: eighteen of twenty pieces are asking for something, two are giving anything away for free, and you've spent a year confused about why "brand awareness isn't converting" when you never built brand awareness in the first place. That's not a tidy discovery. It sits there. You don't get to fix a year of content mix by Friday, and the checklist that got you the diagnosis doesn't hand you the cure. It just tells you which wound is real.

The second cost is smaller but lives in real time: sitting with a live prospect, price objection on the table, and not reaching for the lever that's right there. That takes discipline you will not feel like you have in the moment, especially once you know the discount is the wrong tool. Knowing it upstream and holding the line downstream, under pressure, in front of a person, are two different muscles. The framework gives you the first. It does not give you the second for free.

Where the wrong move and the right move actually diverge

Discount-firstDiagnose-first
AssumptionPrice is the frictionPrice is the last friction, if it's friction at all
First moveCut the number, run the promoTag last 20 pieces of content: WHY / HOW / WHAT
Who shows upBargain hunters, the never-going-to-pay-full-price crowdPeople who already know and half-trust you, now nudged
What it costsMargin, and buyers trained to wait for the next discountTime, and the discomfort of admitting the mix was wrong
What it fixesNothing, if the constraint was upstreamThe actual constraint, whichever stage it turns out to be

The test before Monday

Pull your last 20 pieces of content, emails, posts, ads. Tag each one Know, Like, or Trust. Don't clean the numbers up in your head before you count them. If you're nowhere near 70/15/15, you already have your answer, and it will not feel good to have it.

Then run the aunt question on your own lost deals. For the leads that went quiet, find out what they actually paid elsewhere, or what they were actually willing to pay, before you decide your price was the problem. Sometimes it is. Often it's a $65 budget that was never going to become $300, discount or not, and the discomfort isn't in finding that out. It's in what you do the next time a prospect goes quiet and your hand still moves toward the discount anyway, because that lever is easier to pull than the one that actually works.

Questions

What people ask next

How do I actually tell the difference between a buyer who's structurally never going to reach my price and one who just hasn't moved through Like or Trust yet, when in the moment they look exactly the same?
Run the test from the cake: imagine the discount fully applied and ask what actually changes. If a real price cut would plausibly move them, price was the last friction and they're Trust-stage. If you can picture giving it away at cost and they still wouldn't be a fit for what you actually built, they were never priced to reach you, no matter how close the objection sounds in the moment.
What if my audit turns up more than one broken stage at once, do I try to fix Know and Like together or work through them in order?
The map itself is sequential, Know, then Like, then Trust, so work through it in that order rather than splitting attention. A person can't move to Like if Know is still broken, so fixing downstream stages first just wastes effort on people who were never going to see it.
Once I start shifting my content mix, how long do I hold the line before I know whether it's actually working versus just watching sales slip away?
The article doesn't hand you a fixed number of days, and it's honest that the checklist gives you the diagnosis, not the cure on a schedule. What it does say is that you don't fix a year of skewed content mix by Friday, so the discomfort of not seeing an instant lift is expected, not a signal you misdiagnosed.
While I'm doing this audit and rebuilding the ratio, what do I actually say to a live prospect asking for a discount today?
That depends entirely on which stage your diagnosis says is actually broken for that person. If your audit points to Trust being the real gap, the discount is the right lever and using it there is fine, that's what it's for. If Know or Like is the real gap, the article's whole point is that reaching for the discount anyway just makes your WHAT louder while doing nothing, so the discipline is holding the line even though it's uncomfortable in front of a live person.
How do I sanity check my own diagnosis of the stage before I act on it, given how easy the article says it is to misread which one is actually broken?
Match what you're seeing against the three patterns directly: low reach with strangers never finding you at all is Know, people seeing and following but nothing sticking is Like, and people engaging and asking questions but going quiet right at the ask is Trust. Then check it against your actual content, tag your last twenty pieces WHY, HOW, or WHAT, and see whether the imbalance you find lines up with the behavior pattern you're seeing, rather than assuming Trust just because it's the stage closest to the sale and the easiest lever to reach for.