Atiba de Souza.Start a conversation
WritingLeadership

You Are Not Chasing Bad Leads. You Are Asking Too Early.

By Atiba de Souza

Atiba de Souza sitting in a black office chair with his arms crossed and hands resting on his stomach. The cover reads: LEADERSHIP You Are Not Chasing Bad Leads. You Are Asking Too Early.

The follow-up you keep sending

There is a name in your pipeline you have been chasing for a while now. Good conversation. Real interest. No money.

You have sent the check-in. You have sent the "just circling back." You have wondered, privately, whether they are a tire-kicker, whether the market is soft, whether your price is wrong.

I want to tell you about a room where the decision had already been made against me before I stood up.

The $80,000 decision that had already been made

I gave a presentation. Not a pitch. A presentation built to create demand. Nobody in that room was there to buy, and I did not pretend otherwise. I never put an offer on the table and I never asked for the work.

Afterwards, the person who had already chosen someone else for an $80,000 job walked up to me and said: I was going to hire this person over here to do this job. I was going to pay them $80,000 to do this. But I think you can do it. Can I hire you to do this instead?

They had already chosen someone else. The decision was made before I stood up. And they moved the whole engagement to me, unprompted, with no pitch and no negotiation.

Here is the part I want you to sit with. That presentation never asked for the work. It just made them want it.

A presentation built to close would have walked into that room and met a buyer who had already decided. It would have had nothing to work with. Instead, the demand arrived before I did.

What was in that room and is not in your pipeline

That room had a why in it. Your follow-up emails don't.

The framework I build content on is Why / How / What, and the part people skip past is the split by volume.

70% WHY, 15% HOW, 15% WHAT. Most of what you publish is awareness. You earn the right to ask.

Why carries the 70, and it is awareness. The values, the philosophy, the thing the brand actually believes. One pain point per piece, tied to one of the three motivations that move a human being: relationships, status, or money. And the call to action is deliberately low commitment. Raise your hand. Answer a question. Tell me if this is you. Not "book a call."

How carries 15, and it is where someone moves from knowing you to liking you.

What carries the last 15, and it is where trust gets earned.

Read that as a content calendar and you have wasted it. Read it as a diagnosis.

The 70 is the part that matters. The two 15s are bookkeeping by comparison. If you take one thing from this piece: the ask is the last 15%, not the engine. You have been running the ask as the engine, and then wondering why every lead you meet acts like they are the one doing the interviewing.

Demand: the state where a buyer wants the outcome before you ask them to pay for it. It is not the same as interest, and you cannot close your way into it.

Now the decision the split hands you. Before you send another follow-up to a cold lead, diagnose which stage is missing.

If they do not know what you stand for, the next move is WHY. Not another ask. A piece that shows them the belief.

If they know what you stand for but they do not like you yet, the next move is HOW. They are not ready to trust you because they have not met the person behind the brand.

If they like you but they do not trust you, the next move is WHAT. Trust is earned in the last 15, and you do not get to skip to it.

Do not send another ask until the missing stage is addressed. That is the whole diagnosis.

Here is what it looks like side by side.

Inconsistent with the sequenceConsistent with the sequence
First touchthe offer, againWHY: one belief, one pain point (70%)
What the buyer learnsyour pricewhat you stand for
The follow-up"just circling back"HOW: they get to like you (15%)
The askthe engineWHAT: trust earned last (15%)
When they finally buyyou closed themthey bring you the job

WHY 70% (Know)

HOW 15% (Like)

WHAT 15% (Trust)

skip to the ask

never checked against today's offer

Stranger

Knows you

Likes you

Trusts you

Brings you the job

Failure mode 1: a lead who never buys

Audience you built

Failure mode 2: the wrong audience; work worth nothing

The cost nobody puts in the slide deck

I am not going to hand you a split and pretend it is free.

If 70% of what you put into the world does not ask for money, then for a while your calendar looks emptier than the person down the street who is selling hard every day. That is the trade. You are buying the right to ask later with the only currency that works, which is being known.

Name the rest of it out loud, because it is real.

You have to publish things that do not convert this week. You have to say what you believe in front of people who may never buy. You have to look your partner or your board in the eye and say the pipeline number is going to look flat while something invisible gets built underneath it.

And under all of that is the fear that says if you stop asking, you stop eating. That fear is not stupid. It kept you alive. It is also the fear that built the exact pipeline you are now worn out chasing.

The second way a lead was never going to buy

There is a harder version of this, and it happened to me. I spent a long stretch building an audience. I got there. Then I turned around to put an offer in front of it, and by that point the company whose offer had moved underneath me had changed what it was selling.

The audience was real. It was engaged. It was mine. And it did not want the thing that was now going to market. The work succeeded and it was worth nothing.

I built the wrong audience.

The failure was not the building. It was that I never checked the audience against the current offer somewhere in the middle, while there was still road left to steer. So the decision now is not "write more content on top of it." The decision is to stop and audit what you actually sell today against who is actually listening, before you build one more piece on top of the gap. And if they do not match, the answer may be that the offer has to change, not the audience.

Test the diagnosis before you act on it

When you decide the problem is awareness, imagine it completely solved. A million people know your name tomorrow. What actually changes? If the honest answer is that they still would not buy what you sell today, awareness was never the constraint. Say that out loud to yourself. It saves months.

Two more things that are true and sting.

Adding a service does not create customers. It creates something else nobody knows exists.

And you cannot have a sales conversation without leads, so when you answer "where do more clients come from" with a conversion fix, you have usually given a lead answer wearing a disguise.

Monday

Start by naming the cost, because if you skip this part the rest of it will not survive week three. If 70% of what you publish does not ask for money, the pipeline number is going to look flatter for a while. Decide now that you are willing to pay that, or do not start.

Then decide who has to be told. Your partner. Your board. The person who watches the number and will ask why it dipped. Tell them before you pull anything, so the flat weeks do not read as failure. If you cannot say it out loud to them, you are not ready to run this.

Now pull your last ten pieces and mark each one WHY, HOW, or WHAT. Count them. If it reads like an order form with a logo, you just found your dead leads. They are upstream of your pipeline, not inside it.

Take the three coldest names you are chasing. Pick one, and replace the "just circling back" check-in you were going to send with one WHY piece. Not a mass broadcast. One note to that one person that shows what you stand for. No ask attached.

Then diagnose each of the three by stage. Do they know what you stand for? Do they like you? Do they trust you? The next move is the missing stage, and it is not another ask until that stage is addressed.

Last, run the audit that hurts. Take the offer you sell today and the audience you have today. Would the people on that list buy the thing you currently sell? If the answer is no, or if you cannot answer, that is your answer. And the decision may not be "write more content." The decision may be that the offer has to change. That is a harder Monday than pulling content, and it is cheaper than three more years of building on top of a question you refuse to answer.

When this is the wrong advice

If a buyer has a purchase order in hand and a deadline, answer their question. Do not make a ready buyer sit through your values statement.

If you have no offer and no audience yet, do not start with a content calendar. The split assumes there is a what worth earning the right to ask for.

And if your entire business runs on short, warm referrals, this engine is not the load-bearing wall. Do not rebuild the house for a room you do not need.

The lead is not the problem

The lead you are chasing was never going to buy from you in the state you met them. Not because they are fickle, or broke, or shopping you against three competitors. Because you met them at the ask, and the ask is the last fifteen percent, and the last fifteen percent only lands when the first seventy has already done its job.

Then there is the other kind, the one that takes longer to admit: the audience built before anybody checked it against the offer. That one is on you. It is fixable. And it costs less to fix this week than in three years.

Next week, publish the thing that does not ask.

Questions

What people ask next

Okay but how do I actually tell which stage a lead is stuck on — don't know me, don't like me, or don't trust me — without just guessing and wasting another few weeks on the wrong content?
Ask it as three honest questions in order, not a vibe check. Have they actually seen what you believe, the WHY, anywhere in your past touches with them — if not, that's the gap, full stop. If they've seen the belief but never met the person behind the brand, that's HOW. If they like you and have been around a while but still haven't seen proof the thing works, that's WHAT. You're not guessing at their feelings, you're auditing what you've actually sent them.
If a lead is already asking for pricing, do I really pull back and give them a WHY piece instead, or does that feel insulting at that point in the conversation?
No — if they're asking for pricing, they've already moved past the stage this diagnosis is meant to fix. The split is for cold leads who are stalling, not for someone actively requesting the ask. Give the person who's asking for price an answer; save the WHY piece for the names who go quiet after the good conversation and never bring up money at all.
How long am I supposed to let the pipeline look flat before I admit the diagnosis itself was wrong, instead of just telling myself to be more patient?
Don't set a clock, run the test. Imagine the missing stage completely solved — a million people know your name, or they all like you now — and ask honestly whether they'd buy what you sell today. If the answer is still no, the diagnosis was wrong, not the patience, and no amount of waiting fixes a problem you misnamed.
The audience-versus-offer mismatch happened to someone who was watching for it — what does actually checking 'in the middle' look like in practice, so it doesn't just become another thing I mean to do and never do?
It means stopping, mid-build, and holding up what you sell today next to who is actually listening right now — not who you hoped would be listening when you started. If the offer has shifted underneath the audience, or the audience never matched the offer to begin with, that's the moment to say so out loud, before publishing one more piece on top of the gap.
When a service isn't selling, how do I know if the real problem is that nobody knows what I stand for yet, or that the offer itself is just wrong and no amount of belief-content will fix it?
Run the same test: picture awareness completely solved, everyone knows what you stand for tomorrow. Would they buy this specific offer? If the honest answer is yes, you have a WHY problem and the content split will close it. If the honest answer is still no, awareness was never the constraint — the offer has to change, not the content calendar.